• Beranda
  • Profile
  • Buku Tamu
  • Galeri Foto
  • Prof Mudijia Rahardjo
  • Prof Mudijia Rahardjo
  • Prof Mudijia Rahardjo
  • Prof Mudijia Rahardjo
  • Prof Mudijia Rahardjo

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Artikel
  • Agenda
  • Materi Kuliah
    • Jadwal Mengajar
    • Syllabus
  • Pengumuman/Informasi
  • Karya Ilmiah
  • Galeri Foto
  • Buku Tamu

Latest Articles

  • Pelajaran di Balik Tragedi Jatuhnya Sukhoi
  • Ujian Nasional 2012: Antara Idealisme dan Pragmatisme
  • Agenda
  • Analisis Wacana Pilkada Aceh
  • PENELITIAN MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM: (Sebuah Pencarian Metodologik)

Facebook

Chat

globetrackr

free counters

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday213
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday883
mod_vvisit_counterThis week7341
mod_vvisit_counterThis month20393
mod_vvisit_counterAll535387

Latest Commented On

Ujian Nasional 2012: Antara Idealisme dan Pragmatisme (2 comments)
Bohong: Mengurai Kebohongan Angelina Sondakh (6 comments)
SEGERA EVALUASI SBI DAN RSBI (16 comments)
ISLAM IN THE PAST TEN YEARS IN INDONESIA AND IN THE WORLD [1] (8 comments)
Anatomi Metodologi Penelitian (15 comments)
Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian: Dari Positivistik, Post-Positivistik (Interpretif), hingga Hermeneutika (8 comments)
PENELITIAN MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM: (Sebuah Pencarian Metodologik) (4 comments)
Profesi dan Profesionalisasi Keguruan (10 comments)
DESAIN DAN CONTOH PROSES PENELITIAN KUALITATIF (96 comments)
Ojo Dumeh (5 comments)

Latest News

Pengumuman

19.03.2012 |
... Read more...
Pemberitahuan

21.02.2012 |
... Read more...
Pengumuman MABA 2011

28.07.2011 |
... Read more...
Dear Colleagues and Students,

12.02.2010 |
... Read more...
Joomla! Україна

Polls

Menurut anda artikel apa yang harus diperbanyak
 

Popular

  • Jenis dan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif
  • DESAIN DAN CONTOH PROSES PENELITIAN KUALITATIF
  • PENGEMBANGAN PROFESIONALISME GURU [2]
  • Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif (Sebuah Pengalaman Empirik)
  • Triangulasi dalam Penelitian Kualitatif
RESEARCH DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACH PDF Print E-mail
Written by Prof. Dr. H. Mudjia Rahardjo, M.Si   
Friday, 09 April 2010 01:43

 

Research is a systematic and scientific inquiry done by a variety of  scientists of different academic desciplines for a variey of purposes. Research is a systematic process because it follows a general system whose elements are (1) identification of problems, (2) review of related literature, (3) data collections, (4) data analysis, and (5) drawing conclusions. Research is a scientific  process because it follows a general set of procedures through which a systematic approach is implemented, beginning from the encounter of  some problems in the first step to the drawing conclusions in the final step.

Research is an inquiry which has two components: process and  product. The process is about an area of  inquiry and how it is pursued. The product is the knowledge generated from the process.

Research can be conducted  in classrooms, laboratories, libraries, government offices, companies, in the streets, markets etc. It is, therefore, important for any researcher to gain adequate knowledge and skills about the nature of research, the paradigms, and procedures. It is also important for reseachers to attain some technical and methodological competence so that they can go beyond the stage of general concepts and ideas to pursue research in a meaningful and correct ways.

Scholars believe there is a broad spectrum of research activities that utilize various research methods, ranging from a very simple research to a very complex one, both in positivism and interpretivism paradigms. Each brings methodological consequences and purposes. However, in spite of the complexity of methods and paradigms, according to Wiersma (…, : 3), in a general sense all research is oriented to one or both goals: the extension of knowledge and/or the solution of a problem.

 

 

 

 

This paper is designed primarily for an introductory course for students taking a research methodology both for undergraduate and post-graduate programs.

 

A. RESEARCH  PROCEDURE

THE STEPS:

  1. SELECT THE TOPIC

Research process requires a sequence of steps. The first step is selecting a topic, that is a general area of study or issue (i.e. divorce, crime, education, laws, management, language use, homelessness, etc). The selection of the topic is based on the program of the study, the area of the desciplines,  the personal interest, the practical,   theoretical contribution, and the  institutional contributions).

 

  1. DETERMINE THE PARADIGM (positivism or interpretivism)

Selecting research paradigms is the next step. Paradigm helps us understand phenomena: it advances assumptions about social world, how science should be conducted, and what constitutes legitimate problems, solutions, and criteria of “proof” (Firestone, 1978; Gioia & Pitre, 1990; Kuhn, 1970; in Cresswell, 1994: 1). Paradigm encompasses both theories and methods.

 

Different paradigm determines different onthological, epistemological, axiological, rhetorical and methodological asumption.

 

POSITIVISM is designed to be consistent with the assumption of QUANTITATIVE STUDY -> It is termed as:

  1. the traditional,
  2. the positivist,
  3. the experimental,
  4. the  empiricist paradigm.

 

 

The quantitative thinkings come from an empiricist tradition established by such philoshopers as Comte, Mill, Durkheim, Newton, and Locke (Creswell, 1994: 4).

This study is defined to explain variables, to test theory or to determine   whether a certain predictive theory holds true or not ( as done in SURVEYS of which objective is to examine the relationships between two or more variables; or in EXPERIMENT of which objective is to compare two or more different objects).

Quantitative study is based on testing theory composed of variables, measured with numbers, and analyzed with statistical procedures.

 

INTERPRETIVISM  is designed to be consistent with the assumption of  QUALITATIVE STUDY -> It is termed as:

  1. the constructivist or naturalistic approach (Lincoln & Guba, 1985),
  2. the interpretive approach (J. Smith, 1983)
  3. the postpositivist  or postmodern perspective (Quantz, 1992).

 

This study is defined  to UNDERSTAND a particular social or human problem, situation, events, role, group, or interaction, based on building a complex, holistic picture, formed with words, reporting detailed views of informants, and conducted in a natural setting (as done in ETHNOGRAPHY, CASE STUDIES, GROUNDED THEORY, and PHENOMENOLOGY).

 

Besides, it is an investigative process where the researcher gradually makes sense of a social phenomenon by:

  1. contrasting,
  2. comparing,
  3. replicating,
  4. cataloguing, and
  5. classifying the objects of the study.

 

 

  1. DETERMINE THE FOCUS OF THE STUDY. --> Focus of the study is the most important part in a scholarly work. It may emerge from an extensive literature review, be suggested by colleagues,  researchers, advisors, or practical experiences. A good research begins with straightforward, uncomplicated thoughts, easily read and understood.

 

  1. DRAFT A RESEARCH TITLE.  -> Some suggest that the title be saved at the end after the research is proceeded. However, writing  a working draft title at the beginning  is important to position the central concept before the project starts. Undoubtedly, this working title will be modified as one proceeds the project. Some guidelines  for a good title, as suggested by Wilkinson (1991), are as follows:
    1. be brief
    2. avoid wasting words
    3. eliminate unnecessary words such as:

“ An Approach to ….”,

“ A Study of ….”.

“ An Ethnography: Understanding a Child’s Perception of War”, “An Analysis on …” etc.

    1. Eliminate most articles
    2. Make sure it includes the focus or topic of the study
    3. Use not more than 12 words.

 

  1. Make sure if the topic is researchable by using the following considerations:
    1. Is the topic researchable, given time, resources, and availability of data?
    2. Is there a personal interest in the topic in order to sustain attention?
    3. Will the results from the study be of interest to others ( e.g. , in the state, region, nation, university)?
    4. Is the topic likely to be published in a scholarly journal? (attractive to an academic community?)
    5. Does the study (a) fill a void, (b) replicate, (c) extend, or (d) develop new ideas in the schloarly literature?
    6. Will the project contribute to career goals?

 

Having considered those factors, a researcher needs to ask others for

their reactions and  comments to the topic. Seek reactions from:

a.  colleagues,

b. noted authorities in the field,

c. academic advisors, and

d. faculty committee and colleagues.

 

  1. Formulate the Background of the Study

 

  1. Formulate the Research Question(s)

The topic or focus of research is still large, so it must be narrowed down into a spesific research problem/question.

 

  1. Formulating Theoretical Perspective

Kerlinger (1979: 64)  defines theory as “a set of interrelated constructs (variables), definitions, and propositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of explaining phenomena”.

The functions of theory in Quantitative and Qualitative Research are different due to the nature of the paradigms. In Quantitative Research, where researchers use accepted and precise meanings, a theory is  used deductively and placed  at the beginning of the plan of the research. One thus begins the study advancing a theory, collects data to test it, and reflects on whether the theory is confirmed or disconfirmed by the results of the study.

According to Creswell (1994:  88),  a theory becomes a framework for the entire study. It can be placed in the introduction section, in the review of related literature, immediately after hypotheses, or research questions, or in a separate section of the study.

Therefore, it is often called a theory  base, a theoretical rationale, or a

theoretical perspective.

Theories vary in terms of  their scope. Merriam (in Creswell, 1994: 83) groups theories into three types: (1) Grand Theories (attempt to explain large categories of phenomena and are most common in natural sciences, example,  Darwin’s theory of evolution), (2) Midle-Range Theories (fall between minor working hypotheses of everyday life and the all-inclusive grand theories, example, life span development theories), (3) Substantive Theories (restricted to a particular setting, group, time, population, or problem).

The form of theories might be a series of hypotheses, “if ….then” logic statements, such as “The higher her rank, the greater her influence”.

A theory can be stated as a series of “If ….then statements”, such as “If the frequency of interaction between two or more persons increases, the more they will know each other – both their respect and sentiments”.

In Qualitative Research a theory is treated differently as that in Quantitative approach. In Qualitative Approach, one does not begin with a theory to test or verify. Instead, a theory may emerge during the data collection and analysis phase of the research, or even be used relatively late in the research process as a basis for comparison with other theories.

Using an inductive model of thinking, one will build a new theory by gathering detailed information, forming categories or themes until a theory or pattern emerges.

 

  1. Formulate the Intent, Purpose or the Objetive of the Study
  2. Significance of the Study
  3. Delimitation and the Limitation of the Study
  4. Definitions of the Terms
  5. Data Analysis. ( There are several types and procedures of data analysis in Qualitative Approach. ………….Creswell. 156)

 

B. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES

Axioms

QUANTITATIVE

QUALITATIVE

Paradigm

Positivistic

Interpretivism

The nature of reality

Reality is objective and singular, apart from the researcher

Reality is subjective and multiple as seen by participants in a study

The Relationship of the Reasearcher to the Researched object

Researcher is independent from the object being researched

Researcher interacts with the object being researched

The Role of Values  Reality

Value-free and unbiased

Value-boud and biased

The Process of  Research

- Deductive process

- Cause and effect

- Static Design ---

categories isolated

before study

- Context-free

- Generalizations

leading to prediction

and explanation

- Accurate, and reliable

through validity and

reliability

- Inductive process

- Mutual simultaneous

shaping of factors

- Context –bound

- Emerging design---

categories identified

during research

process

- Patterns- theories

developed for

understanding

- Accurate and reliable

through verification

The Language of Research

Formal

- Based on set

definitions

- Impersonal voice

- Use of accepted

quantitative words or

terms (such as affect,

influence, determine,

cause, relate,

compare, correlate,

and impact)

Informal

- Evolving decisions

- Personal voice

- Accepteed qualitative

words or terms (such

as understanding,

discover, meaning,

verstehen)

The Process of Formulating the Problem

From literature, information to the related object is provided,  variables are known, theories are tested

The problem needs to be explored, as little information exists on the topic, the variables are unknown, the theories are generated

Research Design

1. Surveys (include cross sectional and longitudinal studies using questionnaires or structured interviews for data collection with the intent of generalizing from a sample to a population. The objective is to examine the relationships between two or more groups of variables).

 

2. Experiment (include true experiments with the random assigment of subjects to treatment conditions and quasi experiments  that use nonrandomized design. The objective is to compare two or more groups of  different objects) to get generalization.

 

3. Ex Post facto research (now called a causal comparative research where a researcher attempts to determine the possible cause-effect relationship by observing some existing consequences 9ocuring events) and searching back through data. The researcher does not have direct control of independent variables because they have already occurred.

 

4. Historical research (a critical inqury of which product is the narration or description of past events and facts. The purpose is to reconstruct the past events objectively and accurately often in relation to the tenability of a hypothesis.

1. Ethnography (a researcher studies an intact cultural group in a natural setting in a long period of time by collecting, primarily, observational data). The research process is flexible and typically evolves contextually in response to the lived realities). The objective is to understand reality.

 

 

2. Grounded Theory (a researcher conducts multiple stages of data collection and the refinement and interrelationship of categories of information. The primary characteristics of this design are the constant of comparison of data with emerging categories, and theoretical sampling of different groups to maximize the similarities and differences). The final objective is to derive a theory.

 

3. Case Study ( a researcher explores a single entity (or a case or phenomenon) bounded by time and activity ( a program, events, process, institution, or social group) and collect detailed information by using a variety of data collection procedures during a sustained period of time. The Objective is to explore social phenomena.

 

4. Phenomenology (a researcher examines human lived experiences through detailed description of the people being studied (informants). The procedure involves  studying a small number of subjects through extensive and prolonged engagement to develop patterns and relationship of meanings. The objective is to describe human experiences.

Research Criteria to fulfill

Validity

Reliability

Objectivity

Generality

Credibility

Dependability

Confirmability

Transferability

Research sequence

 

 

The Objective in relation to theory

To test or verify theory

To develop, to generate or to construct theory

 

  • Add New
  • Search
Comments (19)
  • |2010-04-10 00:43:47 Ni'mah Sholihah  - Great
    avatar
    many thanks prof....
    this articel is really really helping me, this is what i need. it is for my preparation to do research for final project of this semester..
    Once more i say so many thanks.... :D
    Reply
  • |2010-04-10 17:03:48 mia
    avatar
    I'm really happy with this article. I had joined proposal seminar for about 5 days, friendly speaking I'm stll confused seeing thier papers. I just ask myself, can I do like this later? hopefully this important article will help me to do my final project later succesfuly. Amien...
    Reply
  • |2010-04-12 08:37:29 laily imaroh  - assalamualaikum...
    avatar
    Iam very proud of you, who always give us a great article to improve our knowledge; and especially for this article will help us to do our final project. :D
    Reply
  • |2010-04-12 11:06:00 izzah  - thank tou very much Prof...
    avatar
    alhamdulillah...tanks for this article.i got reverence again for you to research.i am sure that it can help me very much.
    :D
    Reply
  • |2010-04-13 05:11:35 husain_fikri  - Incorporating qualitative and quantitative
    avatar
    SIR-
    Thank you very much for the abundant and wealthy description of any theories regarding with research design.
    My question is:
    Is it possible to incorporate qualitative and quantitative research design utilized in critical discourse analysis?
    If it is so, how is the process?
    Thank you in advance for the upcoming explanation.
    Reply
  • |2010-04-16 07:20:26 novie moybeka  - thank
    avatar
    :D tq for the resource..i feel getting a new education encouragement and hope you could publish another...
    Reply
  • |2010-04-20 03:07:31 Anonymous
    avatar
    hi.....prof. how are you, i would like to consult to you about some materi research, i'm a student from East Timor
    Reply
  • |2010-04-20 03:09:48 Lidia  - consultation
    avatar
    Hi.....Prof, how are you, i'm Lidia, a student from East Timor would like to talk little bit about the research. Regard
    Reply
  • |2010-04-28 07:37:01 Mudji  - Please
    avatar

    Dear Lidia,

    Thanks for opening my web. Please extend to me your questions on research methodology. I am waiting

    Regards,
    Reply
  • |2010-06-16 09:26:32 Wakhinuddin S
    avatar
    Filosofus, Ringkas tapi Lengkap isi artikel RESEARCH DESIGN. :D
    Reply
  • |2010-06-22 14:32:14 rodgy rapatan  - Cultural achievement of minority elementary school
    avatar
    Good day,
    sir, I am rodgy rapatan from philippines i just would like to ask what is the best paradigm for my study? my study entitled "cultural achievement of minority children".

    thank you so much and best wishes.

    Rodgy R. Rapatan
    Reply
  • |2010-07-22 09:36:43 Mudji  -  Depending on your purpose of research
    avatar


    Dear Mr. Rodgy R Rapatan

    There is no best method nor best paradigm in reserach, but the most appropriate method or paradigm. Related to your question, then it depends on your purpose of the reseacrh: You want to explain various variables or, you want to get undertanding of the topic. If you want to get explanations of various varables then you will use positivism paradigm, On the other hand, if you want to get understanding of the topic, you wll use interpretive paradigm.

    Just try

    Regards,

    Mudji
    Reply
  • |2010-07-27 17:49:02 jhony
    avatar
    thank's a lot prof. it's really help me on my personal task in research method studies.
    Reply
  • |2010-07-27 17:49:31 jhony
    avatar
    thank's a lot
    Reply
  • |2010-07-27 17:50:17 jhony
    avatar
    thank's a lot :pirate:
    Reply
  • |2010-09-28 02:06:51 fitriatul masitoh
    avatar
    :D thank you very much
    Reply
  • |2011-04-11 01:25:04 vienna  - mens gold bracelets on sale
    avatar
    which are fabricated with silver.Therefore, this blazon is usually added than one admeasurement wrist wrist link:http://www.buycheapbracelet.com/categories/cheap-mens-gold-bracel et-210-b0.html wrist and has an aperture on one ancillary so that it block calmly into the arm.
    Reply
  • |2011-04-11 01:25:45 vienna  - buy bracelets online
    avatar
    Try to actualize a faculty of affiliation in your agreeableness bracelet.Once you've absitively absitively buy bracelets online absitively what the Acceptable Luck agreeableness armlet will attending like you'll alpha to accumulate it.
    Reply
  • |2011-04-16 05:05:54 http://www.top-sale-shop.com
    avatar
    link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-c-1587.html Replica Watches is one of watch brands in the world to combine preciseness workmanship and conception with spectacular quality at a reasonable price. Each of the AUDEMARS PIGUET Watches link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-classique-collection -c-1587_1590.html, link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-collection-sport-c-1 587_1588.html, link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-contemporaine-collec tion-c-1587_1591.html, link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-sport-collection-c-1 587_1589.html,which we acquit has been cautiously selected on the basis of quality and value. We have also adjudicated to supply a broad categorisation of fashions to match every activeness. High-quality replica watches at magnetic costs make every finest Fake AUDEMARS link:http://www.top-saleshop.com/audemars-piguet-c-1587.html Watch more than an fantabulous purchase, a beneficial investiture, and a real delight.Do the best matter for yourself and your revenue, purchase Replica Audemars Piguet link:http://www.top-sale-shop.com/audemars-piguet-c-1587.html and stay fashonable.
    Reply
  • |2011-04-16 05:08:12 http://www.replica-all-shop.co
    avatar
    Our company is proud to announce our link:http://www.replica-all-shop.com at amazing prices and discounts,
    wholesale link:http://www.replica-all-shop.com/louis-vuitton-c-4.html, wholesale link:http://www.replica-all-shop.com/chanel-c-41.html and many link:http://www.replica-all-shop.com/coach-c-38.html are selling in the lowest price.We pay special attenttion to the high-grade product particulars, keeping the same superiority materials and workmanship. It could be a great summation to your accumulation. Our in large quantities link:http://www.replica-all-shop.com are configured to be fashionable,
    Luxurious and give great Value to your revenue.you can talk with our online help. and it is including the shipping price.
    Reply
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Gravatar enabled
Comment:
:D:angry::angry-red::evil::idea::love::x:no-comments::ooo::pirate::?::(
:sleep::););)):0
Security
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Powered by !JoomlaComment 4.0 beta1

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Last Updated on Friday, 09 April 2010 01:50
 
 

www.mudjiarahardjo.com 2009