Prof. Dr. H. Mudjia Rahardjo, M.Si - Perbedaan Paradigma Positivism dan Interpretivism

	Ujian Nasional 2012: Antara Idealisme dan Pragmatisme (2 comments)
	Bohong: Mengurai Kebohongan Angelina Sondakh (6 comments)
	SEGERA EVALUASI SBI DAN RSBI (16 comments)
	ISLAM IN THE PAST TEN YEARS IN INDONESIA AND IN THE WORLD [1] (8 comments)
	Anatomi Metodologi Penelitian (15 comments)
	Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian: Dari Positivistik, Post-Positivistik (Interpretif), hingga Hermeneutika (8 comments)
	PENELITIAN MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM: (Sebuah Pencarian Metodologik) (4 comments)
	Profesi dan Profesionalisasi Keguruan (10 comments)
	DESAIN DAN CONTOH PROSES PENELITIAN KUALITATIF (96 comments)
	Ojo Dumeh (5 comments)

Pengumuman

19.03.2012 |
... Read more...

Pemberitahuan

21.02.2012 |
... Read more...

Pengumuman MABA 2011

28.07.2011 |
... Read more...

Dear Colleagues and Students,

12.02.2010 |
... Read more...

Menurut anda artikel apa yang harus diperbanyak

NO.	AKSIOMA	PARADIGMA
NO.	AKSIOMA	POSITIVISM	INTERPRETIVISM
1.	Hakikat Realitas	Tunggal, dapat dipilah-pilah	Jamak, holistik
2	Hubungan peneliti dengan yang diteliti	Terpisah (peneliti tidak harus ke lapangan/boleh orang lain).	Interaktif (peneliti harus ke lapangan). Instrumennya adalah peneliti sendiri
3.	Kemungkinan generalisasi	Generalisasi yang bebas konteks	Generalisasi terikat pada konteks
4.	Kemungkinan hubungan sebab akibat	Hubungan antara sebab akibat jelas	Hubungan sebab dan akibat tidak jelas
5.	Peranan nilai (value)	Bebas nilai (value free) (Penelitian dengan metode yang sama akan menghasilkan nilai yang sama)	Terikat pada nilai (value bound) Penelitian dengan metode dan objek yang sama dapat memperoleh hasil berbeda
6.	Objek	Menekankan produk	Menekankan proses
7.	Posisi Teori	Masalah – teori – data (apriori) logiko hipotetico verifikatif (deduktif)	Masalah – data – teori (a posteriori) induktif
8.	tujuan (dalam kaitan dengan teori)	menguji teori	menemukan teori
9.	Tingkat subjektivitas	Objektif	Subjektif

Kriteria Data

Comments (5)

|2010-03-18 14:58:37 priyo raharjo - great

terima kasih Prof. Setelah membaca artikel ini saya jadi lebih bisa memahami perbedaan paradigma positivism dengan interpretivism. rangkuman ini sangat bermanfaat bagi saya.

Reply

|2010-03-19 01:54:29 sugeng sukolono - self explanatory chart

When it comes to 'research & methodology' your comparative chart is important, but, in my opinion, examples and situations are more important to grasp. Don't get me wrong, i know very little about this subject matter, i'm just looking at it from your students' prespective. Let's take 'positivist padadigm', a real one, situation : Issac Newton induced his theory of Gravity, then ask your students to deduce Newton's general Prinsciple (his theory), or, have them (your students) watch "A Beautiful Mind", you don't have to take them to the movies, just order it and play it in dvd player in the classroom, it's cheap that way. hahaha. The film is about the life of Mathematical genius and nobel laureate John Nash, it may be able to inspire your student to accomplish a great thing. Nash developed and empirically tested his mentors'Game Theory and came up with a new theory that led to the paper ' The Bargaining Problem', published in ECONOMETRICA. As we speak, his theory is being used by economists all over the world.

Reply